Why should we care about some "Fast Food" restaurant?
If that was all it was, we shouldn't - though I have grown hoarse over
the years pointing out that, though they invented "fast food," they did
it when it was really fast, and what is more to the point, when it was
really food.
Let's start with the "fast." If you were an actress, five minutes from
an important open call that could last for many long hours, and were
starving, you could run into the place (conveniently located right
across the street from the theater), march straight up to one of the
myriad little windows, throw your spare change in the slot, take out the
little plate of delicious macaroni and cheese, sit down and finish it
off and still arrive at the audition with seconds to spare. Try doing
that at Mc Donald's, Horn and Hardart's ostensible successor.
And then there was the "food." Made fresh every morning from the best
quality and freshest ingredients (often according to recipes created by
some of the country's finest chefs and perfected over decades), rushed
to each outlet in some of the city's last electric trucks, to be
burnished, browned, crisped, and sold, often still hot from the oven, to
an unabashedly enthusiastic customer for the price of a few coins. No
chemicals, no preservatives, and no junk food. This was gourmet cooking
for a pittance. Would anyone describe Taco Bell or Kentucky Fried
Chicken that way?
So they served decent food, cheaply and in a hurry, what's the big deal?
When the first Automat opened in 1902, the United States had begun, in
earnest, its ascent to becoming one of the most powerful countries in
the world. It had done this the old-fashioned way, by assembling an
empire made up of less industrialized, militarily backward and
agriculture-based territories like those in Latin America, the American
West, and the Far East. Through immigration and conquest, there was an
abundance of low-wage, but nevertheless often skilled, labor, crucial to
the development of a strong manufacturing-based economy.
This process was also made possible due to the triumphs of modern
mechanical engineering. The steam engine and the machinery it ran, the
train, mass production techniques, and abundant fuel for refrigeration
and power production, all played key roles. Access to plentiful water
and good agricultural land, albeit much of it wrested from its former
owners, completed the picture. It almost seemed as though man had
conquered not just other men, but nature itself, mountains, tunnels and
bridges, the material plane in its entirety, and was ready to move on to
greater triumphs. We had collectively evolved past the stage of
producing the goods needed to prosper, and were ready to take on other
greater challenges, perhaps even to devote ourselves to higher purposes.
Nowhere did these pieces fit closer together than in the great
northeastern cities, the original Capitals of the Republic, Philadelphia
and New York. Densely populated with both long-time residents and newer
arrivals, their diversity of activity and regular European-style urban
organization, multi-story buildings and ubiquitous streetcars, defined
the modern city.
When Joseph Horn and Frank Hardart began their little luncheonette
business, across the street from Wanamaker's Department Store in
Philadelphia in 1892, they were too busy cooking and cleaning to have
any time to imagine the day, thirty years later, when they would be
serving a million dishes of food a day to a growing army of famished and
grateful patrons. As novice entrepreneurs with a limited amount of
borrowed money, they were probably worried that they wouldn't last even
one year, having used up their entire investment putting together their
first tiny enterprise.
Luckily, Frank Hardart had learned in a previous job in New Orleans,
how to make a great cup of "French Roast" coffee. Like the founder of
STARBUCKS over a century later, he realized that the magical properties
of caffeine, heated sufficiently to rush it into the bloodstream of
urbanites, frantic for the fuel needed to get around the next lap, was
black gold, legal dope, and a mighty fine cup of joe. You could hardly
find a better way to spend a nickel.
One other invaluable insight shared by these erstwhile partners, was
that people were tired of the shabby fare passed off as food, which
typified moderately priced restaurants of their time. In contrast to
the nearly universal contempt in which restaurateurs held their
low-income patrons, Horn and Hardart began to upgrade and improve their
offerings until they stood stories above their competitors. During the
ten-year period in which they operated their modest establishment, they
were rewarded with a growing and grateful clientele.
It was at this point that a timely trip by Hardart to Europe uncovered
the existence of the "waiterless restaurant," an innovation based upon a
vending device capable of serving food through little windows. A
shipment of these devices to the States followed quickly and, after a
series of radical modifications and improvements, their first
implantation on Chestnut Street in Philadelphia. The popularity of this
system was established rapidly and expanded to a chain of eighty stores,
equally divided between New York and its native Philadelphia. Its dual
and seemingly contradictory identity, as a rare and exotic phenomenon,
an absolute must-see destination for tourists from around the country
and the world, and yet the most commonplace, and ubiquitous place to
grab a good and quick meal, for locals, began almost immediately and
never ended.
The survival of this institution and especially its ability to maintain
its unique high standards over that period of time, for nearly a
century, is quite remarkable. The expansion of the operation into the
first large-scale retail take-out operation, with hundreds of "Less Work
for Mother" outlets also selling freshly made and high quality fare,
marks them as the precursor of another of the 20th century's major
gastronomical business developments. Along with their ability to see
the future and show the way to legions of others who could not, their
story is a textbook example of the rewards of doing things right, not
just doing them first. Using "economy of scale" as their lever, they
were able to demonstrate that you did not have to compromise quality in
order to be able to provide value. Still, few others in their wake have
ever been able to combine the two notions with more skill and adherence
to principle than those two fellows did.
Aside from their fare, the most remarkable and influential aspect of the
Automats was the places from which they operated. By securing 99-year
leases on the most trafficked corners of New York City, they became, in
effect, the most comfortable and accessible, virtually permanent, common
spaces within the most important city of the 20th century. Their very
existence broadcast a message of hospitality and openness that warmed
the hearts of both rich and poor and suggested a world in which the best
of everything would be available to one and all regardless of station or
circumstance. Their convenience and good cooking allowed them to fill
the needs of both the busiest tycoon and the most relaxed derelict, as
likely as not, seated at the same table. "To each according to his
needs" said Marx and Engels; but these stone capitalists did a better
job of spreading that notion than a country full of communist
bureaucrats ever could.
Politics aside, there is another group of individuals who found the
provision of free space to sit, to gab, to conjure, and to speculate
invaluable. They are the creative types who also tended to use New York
City as a laboratory for their ideas, a place to evolve and test new
notions, new ways of looking at life and expressing those discoveries.
As an example, the hottest show on Broadway this year and probably for
the last few decades is "The Producers." A part of the stage set is the
Automat. Why? Well, the simple answer is that it is a highly visual
object, widely identifiable, and long a feature of the Times Square
milieu central to that show's storyline. Another reason may well be
that when Mel Brooks, the mad genius behind the production, and his
madcap buddies from the old Sid Caesar "Show of Shows," Neil Simon, Nat
Hiken, Woody Allen etc, needed to get some air and some chow, they
hot-footed it over to H&H. There, they knew a dozen of them could carry
on at full volume, as though they were back in their studio, and create
those insane routines for Caesar, Coca, and the rest, to collapse us
with hilarity each week. In fact, Simon and Allen used to rent the last
Automat, at 42nd and 3rd avenue, in its waning days, for private parties
to celebrate the release of their latest movies.
Here's a joke: A fellow goes into the Automat and starts pumping nickels
into the machines and taking out pieces of pie, one after another.
After awhile the manager of the place begins to wonder what's going on
and goes over to the fella and asks him what he's doing. "Leave me
alone," says the guy, "can't you see I'm winning?"
Am I trying to say this was a funny place? Hardly. It was already true
during the Depression, that an uncomfortable number of homeless and
other ambulatory types had begun to make the Automat just a touch
dreary. It is legendary how the free tomato ketchup and a shot of hot
water turned into some of the best "tomato soup" in town and the free
lemons and ice water added quite a refreshing "lemonade" to the meal.
It was the closest thing we ever had to the world-class commissary, a
place for all the extras in the movie called "Life" to catch some chow
before the big scene went before the cameras. One fascinating question
is how many people, temporarily down on their luck, survived partly due
to the existence of these places, and later went on to become our
captains of industry and masters of their fates?
Writers, dancers, painters, musicians are only some of those who must
endure long periods of learning and developing their skills and
sensibilities before they may emerge as fully-formed and productive
members of their professions. Students, out-of-towners just learning
their ways around, recent casualties of broken relationships are other
characters in search of themselves who may have found the clean floors
and cheap eats vital to their sanity and survival at some point in their
lives. Parents of limited means looking for a place to show their kids
a great time on a very limited budget, gave thanks for the genuine fun
you can have there, without worrying about a little noise being made.
It is amazing how many people have warm thoughts about what was, after
all, just a business, who have invested it with a kind of mythical aura,
who smile when they remember what experiences they had.
There was, tucked away in a safe at the Horn and Hardart's
headquarters, a book which some called "The Bible." While it was true
that both principals in this company were Catholics, there was no
religious text in this volume. Instead it was filled with secret
formulas for less than exotic offerings like macaroni and cheese and
baked beans with precise measurements of quantities and, just as
importantly, systems for preparing these dishes. Everything was
specified as carefully and accurately as possible, and even after the
death of both Joseph Horn and Frank Hardart, it was declared than no
variations on these recipes would be allowed. No new-fangled "improved"
or "modernized" ingredients, no chemicals, no cheaper substitutes could
ever be included in them. These were not passing fancies; they were
alchemical formulae, and woe to he who messed with them. You would not
have to just answer to the ghosts of H&H; you would have to deal with
the keepers of the book and the flame.
Another sacred principle was Consistency. Everyone who worked at the
company knew about the infamous "Tasting Table" that, every week as
regular as Sunday mass, met to make certain, through random selection of
dishes from all of the many branches, that local managers were doing
their part to keep the sacred fire lit. Out of the temple one could be
cast for a grievous enough burning of the dinner rolls, or overcooking
of the mashed potatoes or the creamed spinach. This was not simply
discipline; this was the purification of the ritual ceremony called
"Lunch." This was the raising of the torch into that dark cave of
economical repast, the elevation of the common man on tiny cushions of
taste buds unto a possible saved man, given a glimpse, through little
glass windows, of the promised land and its bounties.
One day, while I was standing on 53rd street in Manhattan, Bill Gates
and his entourage happened to be passing by. I fell into step with him
and asked whether he had ever heard of the Automat. He answered "yes"
so I went on to tell him that I liked to call it "Windows 02" after the
year in which the first one was installed. What I didn't have the
chance to tell him as he whisked along, was how the most estimable,
audacious, and idealistic phenomenon, a tour de force of (mechanical)
engineering and the elevation of the visual, the instantaneous, the
effortless and the economical had led inexorably to the creation if its
own dialectical opposite: overpriced, over-hyped, processed junk food.
I would have followed that observation with a warning, that no matter
how well intentioned and valuable a journey into the unknown may be, the
most important and difficult task is keeping what is discovered there
from being turned, over time, into its own worst enemy.
Proposal
A weekly or monthly TV show be produced, made up of recollections and
stories and jokes of aficionados of the Automat, which tend to give
insight into the past century and the gifts and hazards it has provided.
[ ]
Was the Automat the Lost City of Atlantis?
The Last Automat